No, China Does Not Require Biometric ID Checks to Leave Your Neighborhood

Social media posts claim that China operates a mandatory biometric “digital ID” system for all citizens, linked to an AI surveillance network with “hundreds of millions of facial recognition cameras,” requiring biometric verification for daily activities including food purchases. The posts also claim that a “social credit score” automatically triggers travel bans, loan denials, and blocks children from school enrollment, and that citizens must pass facial-recognition checks to leave their neighbourhoods. These claims combine real elements of China’s surveillance infrastructure with overstated language. The overall narrative is misleading, and the neighborhood exit requirement is false.

Social Media Posts

Viral posts circulating on social media claim that China already operates a universal biometric digital ID tied to a nationwide AI surveillance network. The posts suggest that routine actions, such as buying food or boarding trains, require biometric verification, and that a single “social credit score” automatically controls major life outcomes.

Source | Archive

There are also similar claims circulating that China requires citizens to use facial recognition (a “biometric digital ID”) to leave their residential neighborhood zones.

Source | Archive

Fact Check

Digital ID and biometric identity

China has maintained a national resident ID card system and requires real-name registration for telecom and many online services. In 2025, China’s Cyberspace Administration (CAC) introduced the Administrative Measures on the National Online Identity Authentication Public Service, which took effect on July 15, 2025. These measures describe an online identity authentication service that can issue a “web number” and “web certificate” to verify identity without revealing personal information directly to platforms. The regulation states that eligible individuals may voluntarily apply for these credentials. The measures describe an online identity verification system rather than a mandatory biometric ID system for all daily activities.

The official regulatory framework distinguishes between several systems: the existing legal ID and real-name registration requirements, biometric technology deployment in certain contexts, and the newer online identity service. According to the official rules, the online “cyber ID” is described as voluntary for individuals and is designed for online identity verification purposes. 

Facial Recognition Rules and Consent

China uses facial recognition technology in various settings, and there are ongoing privacy concerns within the country. In March 2025, Reuters reported that the CAC published regulations stating that entities should not force individuals to verify identity using facial recognition and should offer other options. The Reuters report notes requirements such as consent and visible notices where facial recognition is used, while also noting that these rules do not apply to national-security or law-enforcement surveillance.

Facial recognition is present and used in some contexts in China, but the regulatory framework indicates that in commercial and many civilian settings, biometric verification is not universally mandatory and alternatives should be available.

Scale of Camera Surveillance

China is widely described as having one of the world’s largest surveillance camera ecosystems. Industry estimates from earlier reporting put China at roughly 170 million CCTV cameras with projections of continued expansion. TechCrunch’s coverage of a BBC segment reflected those estimates and projections, illustrating the scale often referenced in public discussion.

The phrase “hundreds of millions of facial recognition cameras” appears frequently in public discourse. Available evidence supports “hundreds of millions of surveillance cameras” as a reasonable characterization of China’s camera infrastructure, though the proportion equipped or actively used for facial recognition at any given time varies by region, vendor, and deployment purpose. Some sources cite higher figures (for example, a U.S. House hearing submission referenced “700 million” as an estimate), though these remain estimates with uncertain methodology.

China has deployed extensive surveillance camera infrastructure and uses AI analytics in governance and policing. The characterization becomes less precise when it describes a uniform, fully integrated network of “hundreds of millions of facial recognition cameras” tracking all individuals’ movements nationwide in real time, as actual capabilities and implementation vary significantly across different contexts and locations.

(Source: TechCrunch, US House Documents, AP News)

Daily life and biometric verification

The statement that buying food generally requires biometric verification is not supported. Everyday life in China commonly involves mobile payments and real-name-linked services, but that is different from mandatory live biometric checks for routine transactions. The 2025 Reuters report about facial recognition rules explicitly describes regulators saying people should not be forced into facial recognition identity checks and should have alternatives, which directly conflicts with the claim’s absolutist “every move requires biometric verification” language. 

Biometrics can be required in particular higher-security or identity-sensitive contexts (such as certain transport hubs, border control processes, or specific access-control systems in workplaces or residential compounds), but that is a narrower point than the viral narrative suggests. The viral claim overgeneralizes selective or localized use into a nationwide requirement for routine daily living. 

Social Credit and Blacklists

China’s “social credit” system is often misunderstood as a single nationwide score that controls every aspect of people’s lives. Research from MERICS (Mercator Institute for China Studies) clarifies that China does not have one unified social credit score for all citizens. Instead, the system operates through compliance records, data files, and enforcement mechanisms in specific sectors (such as finance, courts, and transport) rather than a single master score. MERICS also found that earlier points-based pilot programs have been discontinued or made voluntary in many areas.

However, targeted enforcement blacklists do exist and have real consequences, particularly for people who fail to comply with court judgments. China Daily reported in 2017 that millions of people who defaulted on court orders were barred from buying plane or high-speed train tickets, a result of coordination between courts and transport companies. Reuters similarly reported in 2018 on plans to restrict travel for individuals with “bad social credit” in certain categories, showing how travel bans are used as an enforcement tool in specific cases.

The claim that children can be “blocked from enrolling in school” due to a low social credit score is overstated. What actually happens in some cases is that court enforcement measures restrict “high-level consumption” for judgment defaulters, which can include limits on sending children to expensive private schools, not a complete ban on basic education or school enrollment. China Justice Observer explains these “high-level consumption” restrictions in the context of court enforcement. The viral claim exaggerates a limited, category-specific penalty into a sweeping nationwide rule supposedly controlled by a single personal score.

(Source: China Daily, China Justice Observer)

Neighborhood Movement Claim

We found no evidence that people in China today generally must pass a facial-recognition “biometric digital ID” check simply to leave their neighborhood zones. This claim appears to recycle COVID-19-era movement controls, when some localities used health-code apps (QR codes), checkpoints, and compound-level gate checks to restrict movement during lockdowns. Credible accounts describe how China rolled back major parts of the health-code regime and “zero-COVID” controls in December 2022. For example, The Washington Post reported that frequent testing and digital health codes were no longer required for daily life or domestic travel after policy changes announced on Dec. 7, 2022, while China Briefing similarly described the abandonment of key pillars such as health codes and centralized quarantine around that period. A peer-reviewed overview of China’s policy shift also notes the Dec. 7, 2022 decision to lift most “zero-COVID” restrictions. 

Facial recognition does remain widely deployed in specific access-control environments, but this is different from a nationwide rule about leaving a neighborhood. It has been reported in some university dormitories and campus management systems (for example, dorm-entry installations reported at Beijing Normal University) and in some residential compounds as part of “smart community” security upgrades. (Source: Reuters, Sixth Tone)

When a facial recognition scan fails, there is no credible evidence that people are simply “locked in” and unable to leave. While access systems may initially deny entry when a scan doesn’t work, they typically offer backup options such as access cards, PIN codes, or staff verification. Recent legal developments also discourage “face-only” requirements in everyday civilian settings. China’s Supreme People’s Court has ruled that collecting facial data without consent can be unlawful in civil contexts and that building entry systems should provide alternative verification methods. In 2025, Reuters reported that China’s cyberspace regulator stated facial recognition should not be forced on individuals and that reasonable alternatives should be available (though these rules have noted exceptions for national security and law enforcement surveillance).

Conclusion

The viral claims about China’s digital ID and surveillance system mix real elements with significant exaggerations. China does have extensive surveillance infrastructure and real-name registration requirements, and the 2025 online identity authentication system is a real development, but it is described as voluntary for individuals, not a mandatory biometric ID for all daily activities.

The claim that citizens must pass facial-recognition checks to leave their neighborhoods is false; while such technology exists in some specific locations like university dorms or residential compounds, it is not a universal requirement, and China ended most COVID-era movement controls in December 2022. The “social credit” system is real but fragmented across sectors rather than a single score, and enforcement measures like travel bans target specific court judgment defaulters, not the general population based on a universal score.